{"id":487,"date":"2019-05-19T17:58:56","date_gmt":"2019-05-19T08:58:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/?p=487"},"modified":"2019-05-19T18:02:45","modified_gmt":"2019-05-19T09:02:45","slug":"china-changes-university-entrance-exam-rules-to-favor-mixed-families-in-troubled-xinjiang","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/2019\/05\/19\/china-changes-university-entrance-exam-rules-to-favor-mixed-families-in-troubled-xinjiang\/","title":{"rendered":"China changes university entrance exam rules to favor mixed families in troubled Xinjiang"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.japantimes.co.jp\/news\/2019\/05\/17\/asia-pacific\/china-changes-university-entrance-exam-rules-favor-mixed-families-troubled-xinjiang\/?fbclid=IwAR37kTuo7mFllHNeTJGj6g49g-p_cBpTSBIKZPQmDXUfc374Gt8WfJ0FWjY#.XODHmcgzbMU\">https:\/\/www.japantimes.co.jp\/news\/2019\/05\/17\/asia-pacific\/china-changes-university-entrance-exam-rules-favor-mixed-families-troubled-xinjiang\/?fbclid=IwAR37kTuo7mFllHNeTJGj6g49g-p_cBpTSBIKZPQmDXUfc374Gt8WfJ0FWjY#.XODHmcgzbMU<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.japantimes.2xx.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/f-chinjiang-a-20190518-870x580.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><figcaption>An image of Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen looming over Kashgar, in far-western Xinjiang autonomous region, last November. | BLOOMBERG <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.japantimes.2xx.jp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/f-chinjiang-a-20190518-870x580.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><figcaption>An image of Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen looming over Kashgar, in far-western Xinjiang autonomous region, last November. | BLOOMBERG <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">BEIJING &#8211;&nbsp;China\u2019s fractious far-west region of Xinjiang has changed its university entrance exam rules to give children from mixed families a leg up on other students, in what experts say are the latest efforts to erase a mostly Muslim ethnic culture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Following a flare-up in violence in 2014, Chinese authorities have rolled out draconian security measures across Xinjiang in recent years, from banning long beards and Islamic veils to placing an estimated 1 million mostly Muslim ethnic minorities in internment camps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Chinese officials describe the facilities as voluntary \u201cvocational education centers\u201d where Turkic-speaking people are taught Mandarin and job skills in a bid to steer them away from religious extremism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But rights groups and former inmates see the measures as part of a campaign to forcefully assimilate Uighurs and other minorities into the majority ethnic Han society, diluting their cultures and religious beliefs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Observers say the change in the university enrolment system is another step in that direction, particularly in a region where Uighurs made up almost half of the 23-million-strong population, according to 2015 statistics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In an online notice posted last week, the Xinjiang government published new rules for giving bonus points to disadvantaged groups in the nationwide college entrance exams \u2014 a key deciding factor for attending university in China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a reversal of last year\u2019s policy, the regional government doubled the number of bonus points allocated to interethnic students \u2014 defined as those with one Han parent \u2014 to 20, while more than halving the amount for students whose parents are both ethnic minorities to 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The new exam policy is \u201cpart of this effort to \u2018sinocize\u2019 any kind of non-Han forms of thoughts and behavior,\u201d said James Leibold, a professor at La Trobe University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The government believes that \u201cinterethnic marriage is a key vehicle for promoting national integration and assimilating the Uighurs and other ethnic minorities in the Chinese nation,\u201d Leibold, who studies ethnic relations and policy in China, said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Timothy Grose, a China ethnic policy expert at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, said the \u201cnew incentives for intermarriage expose the CCP\u2019s (Chinese Communist Party) systematic approach to weakening Turkic-Muslim identities.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPerhaps officials are re-introducing the \u2018carrot\u2019 when in the past few years they have only been lashing the \u2018stick,\u2019 \u201d said Grose, whose research focuses on Uighurs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The change in exam policy is not the first time Chinese authorities have offered incentives for interethnic mixing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2014, the Qiemo County government in Xinjiang reportedly announced it would give mixed couples \u2014 one Han, one minority \u2014 annual cash payments of 10,000 yuan ($1,450) for the first five years of their marriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cChinese policymakers and sociologists have long viewed high rates or high instances of interethnic marriage as a kind of proxy symbol for social cohesion and national integration,\u201d explained Leibold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On top of initiatives spearheaded by the government, videos promoting Uighur-Han marriages have also emerged on social media over the past year, though it is unclear whether they are directly linked to official policies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In October, a video published by \u201cGrandma Li,\u201d a culture and lifestyle social media account run by a Xinjiang-based woman, encouraged more people to move to the region to \u201clook for love.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cEven though their ethnicity is different and their beliefs are different, it seems like it (interethnic marriage) is happening more and more now,\u201d said Li. \u201cBesides, the government is very much encouraging it \u2014 there are even rewards,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But it is unlikely that the latest government-backed incentive will change perceptions of Uighurs and Han across ethnic lines, experts say.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Though statistics on interethnic marriage in China are scarce, national census data from 2010 shows that both Han and Uighur populations tend to marry within their ethnic group, with only 0.2 percent of Uighurs married to Han people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOfficials have encouraged interethnic marriage for decades, but with little success,\u201d said Grose. \u201cI don\u2019t see how this change to test scores will persuade minorities in droves to seek out Han partners.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Online, Chinese social media users have voiced skepticism toward top-down policies rewarding interethnic marriages, with some complaining that they are unfair to Han people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThere\u2019s a great deal of mutual suspicion and distrust between the two groups but that doesn\u2019t stop the party-state from trying to push the agenda,\u201d said Leibold.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>https:\/\/www.japantimes.co.jp\/news\/2019\/05\/17\/asia-pacific\/china-changes-university-entrance-exam-rules-favor-mixed-families-troubled-xinjiang\/?fbclid=IwAR37kTuo7mFllHNeTJGj6g49g-p_cBpTSBIKZPQmDXUfc374Gt8WfJ0FWjY#.XODHmcgzbMU BEIJING &#8211;&nbsp;China\u2019s fractious far-west region of Xinjiang has changed its university entrance exam rules to give children from mixed families a leg up on &hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":307,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[4],"class_list":["post-487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-human-rights"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=487"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":490,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487\/revisions\/490"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yuzb.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}